I've been reading G.K. Chesterton's book Orthodoxy lately (partly because Tim Fall said I should) and am finding it so interesting. It's a small but very meaty book in which Chesterton essentially explains how he came to Christian faith: how he speculated about many things such as optimism and pessimism, humankind's relation to the world, free will, progress, even fairy tales -- and how he came to realize that Christianity answered his questions and solved the riddles he'd been pondering. The way he explains arriving at that realization is outstanding:
***************************************
"And then followed an experience impossible to describe. It was as if I had been
blundering about since my birth with two huge and unmanageable machines, of
different shapes and without apparent connection--the world and the Christian
tradition. I had found this hole in the world: the fact that one must somehow
find a way of loving the world without trusting it; somehow one must love the
world without being worldly. I found this projecting feature of Christian
theology, like a sort of hard spike, the dogmatic insistence that God was
personal, and had made a world separate from Himself. The spike of dogma fitted
exactly into the hole in the world--it had evidently been meant to go there--
and then the strange thing began to happen. When once these two parts of the two
machines had come together, one after another, all the other parts fitted and
fell in with an eerie exactitude. I could hear bolt after bolt over all the
machinery falling into its place with a kind of click of relief. Having got one
part right, all the other parts were repeating that rectitude, as clock after
clock strikes noon. Instinct after instinct was answered by doctrine after
doctrine. Or, to vary the metaphor, I was like one who had advanced into a
hostile country to take one high fortress. And when that fort had fallen the
whole country surrendered and turned solid behind me. The whole land was lit up,
as it were, back to the first fields of my childhood. All those blind fancies of
boyhood which in the fourth chapter I have tried in vain to trace on the
darkness, became suddenly transparent and sane. I was right when I felt that
roses were red by some sort of choice: it was the divine choice. I was right
when I felt that I would almost rather say that grass was the wrong colour than
say it must by necessity have been that colour: it might verily have been any
other. My sense that happiness hung on the crazy thread of a condition did mean
something when all was said: it meant the whole doctrine of the Fall. Even those
dim and shapeless monsters of notions which I have not been able to describe,
much less defend, stepped quietly into their places like colossal caryatides of
the creed. The fancy that the cosmos was not vast and void, but small and cosy,
had a fulfilled significance now, for anything that is a work of art must be
small in the sight of the artist; to God the stars might be only small and dear,
like diamonds. And my haunting instinct that somehow good was not merely a tool
to be used, but a relic to be guarded, like the goods from Crusoe's ship-- even
that had been the wild whisper of something originally wise, for, according to
Christianity, we were indeed the survivors of a wreck, the crew of a golden ship
that had gone down before the beginning of the world."
I am so glad you are liking Orthodoxy, Jeannie. Isn't Chesterton's word choice and imagery amazing? Spike doctrines and creedal caryatids. Who comes up with these things?!
ReplyDeleteYes, he had an AMAZING imagination!!
Delete